Each chapter skilfully maps the possibilities of harmonization while, at the same time, raising cautionary flags about the limits of that project. In this book, an unparalleled collection of legal theorists examine the relationship between these two bodies of law. For others, the relationship is a more complicated sibling rivalry. For some, this relationship is viewed as a mutually reinforcing effort between like-minded regimes designed to civilize human behavior. In the process, human rights law and international humanitarian law have developed a complicated sibling relationship. In the last two decades, human rights law has played an expanding role in the legal regulation of wartime conduct. The next Geneva Convention: filling a post-war legal gap with human rights values Brian Orend. Whither international martial law? John Dehn Forcible alternatives to war: legitimate violence in twenty-first-century international relations Janina Dill New Frameworks for Regulating Armed Violence: 8. The use and abuse of analogy in IHL Kevin Jon Heller Ending the global war: the power of human rights in a time of unrestrained armed conflict Jonathan Horowitz Conceptual Limits of the Law of War Framework: 5. Acting as a sovereign versus acting as a belligerent Jens David Ohlin Rethinking the relationship between IHL and IHRL Marko Milanovic Human rights thinking and the laws of war David Luban Convergence and Divergence of Human Rights and Laws of War: 1. Introduction: the inescapable collision Jens David Ohlin.Bibliography Includes bibliographical references and index.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |